Journal article "metaphors"

This artical was about a simple metaphor writing assignment a college proffessor gave to all his students, gifted or not, and what can come from this assignment and ones similar to this one. It is organized by separating different types of metaphor written by different students that symbolize different things in their writing styles and history. I believe the central claim to his article is that metaphors are a good way to analyze people and their writing styles and history. It also goes into describing how different fears, strengths, and weaknesses develop from past experiences and how they are found within these metaphors.
Each section of this article shows different types of writing styles and maybe why they developed. Most of the reasons consist of how grading of past essays went or even how the assignment was set up. The way this was set up was a good way of making the different styles clear and separated.

discussion question #3

  With the new availability to publish work on the internet, it is common that a lot of information out there on the web is inaccurate.  Because of its history of having inaccurate postings, Wikipedia is becoming a concern for many people and institutions across the nation.  This is the reason for the Middlebury College's policy.  Personally, I don't believe there policy is the way to go.  Although that citing Wikipedia is not a proper college strategy, college students should be able to decide what is a good source and what is not.  These skills should be used for not only Wikipedia but every source that is available on the internet.  So, though i do not agree with using Wikipedia as a cite in college, i do believe it should be up to the student whether or not it should be used.  They have the right to use what they want, and let their grade be the punishment for inaccuracy in their citations.
  Like other people said in this article, Wikipedia could be used in certain situations.  Whether it is used to find another reference or used itself as information, there are times where Wikipedia is appropriate to use.  I believe it should be used under the discretion of the student, and if they make a wrong choice, let it show in their grade.  I believe that policies such as Middlebury's is unenforcable and unnecessary.

  With the film and the book about Chris McCandless, most people are able to really understand what was happening to this kid.  Although one has a different style and it maybe everything is more dramaticized in the movie, the readers/viewers get the big picture on Chris.  He is a man looking for himself and true life by wandering the world.
  The main difference between the movie and the book is how the back home life for Chris was portrayed.  Like the blogger that blogged the book to movie comparison blog we read, i also wander about his at home life due to the differences in the book and movie.  The book goes into the situation a little, but doesn't make it seem like it is a place impossible to return too.  But in the movie, there are fights and violence between the parents that no kid should have to endure.  So whether this is the real situation, i do not know, but that's how it was made in the movie.
  The movie shows Chris in a more personal level.  It showed Chris as a funny down-to-earth kind of guy.  But it also showed the extrodinary sides of him.  These sides include things as extremely hard-working, persistant, and very intelligent.  Many claim to have these attributes, but very few reach the level of Chris'.

  Ever since the beginning of the book, I felt that Chris was a tad on the crazy side, but I also felt some respect for what he attempted to do.  At the beginning, when i read some of the things that he did like burning over one hundred dollars or donating well around twenty-four thousand dollars to a charity, i felt that he had lost his mind and was nuts.  But, then i began to think.  Maybe he wasn't crazy but one of very few normal people.  It is quite possible that material things such as money and getting a new car has turned the majority of us into lunatics.  Maybe he was the one who saw the light and could look back and criticize us as being crazy becuase he found hapiness.  But no one will ever know unless they try to do what Chris did.
  I feel that the McCandless family probably felt hurt and many memories came back to them as they revisited the bus.  Billie states that many people said that they admired what Chris did.  She also said that she would agree with them if he did not die.  She wishes to have him back but knows it is irreversable.

In the chapters 8-10, Krakauer focuses on other outsiders that have lived the same life that Chris McCandless lived.  The purpose was to show that Chris was similar to these people in many ways, but different none-the-less.  People critisized Chris as being just one of those dumb people that think they can handle the wild.  Some go on to say it was disrespectful of Chris and that they have no sympathy for him.
  A person's name should "fit" the person living it.  Like the example of Mrs. Mickel's friend Cat and even Chris, they didn't feel their real name fit their personality.  A name should say a lot about a person.

  These two men were both on the same page when they published these statements.  Tolstoy's excerpt is a piece about him or a character he wrote about wanting to live a dangerous and unexpected life and stray from the ordinary.  Stegner goes into almost describing why one might one that by pointing out the natural desires man crave.
  I agree what these men have to say.  Tolstoy wants to get away from the ordinary life and be free and wild.  This seems like the right way to live.  I also see where Stegner gets the information he writes about towards human beings.  I fell that same craving for excitement and freedom.
  I think McCandless definitely got his ideas of travelling from these authors.  He favored these types of writers the most and made their words his life.